In order to give effect to some extent to the recommendations of the Chamier Committee, the central legislature enacted the Indian Bar Councils Act in 1926. [lxxxv] The purpose of the Act, as set out in its preamble, was to provide for the formation and formation of bar associations for certain courts in British India, to confer powers on and impose obligations on such bar associations, and to protect the law in respect of legal professionals, who have the right to practise, to consolidate and observe before these courts. The purpose of the law was therefore to unite the different levels of the legal profession and to give a certain degree of self-administration to the bars affiliated to the different courts. According to the rules established by the approved High Courts, there were roughly three categories of legal professionals: lawyers, lawyers and Vakils. The lawyers were mainly lawyers from England or Iceland or members of the faculty of lawyers from Scotland. The Vakils were Indian practitioners. [lxviii] The legal profession has always been an important link in the administration of justice. Without the profession of lawyer, the courts would not be able to act effectively and administer justice because evidence in support of or against the parties to an application cannot be lawfully collected, the facts cannot be adequately formulated, and the appropriate legal arguments for or against the parties` case cannot be presented in court. “A well-organized system of judicial administration suggests a well-equipped and competent bar.” The modern legal profession in India has border roots and emerged with the advent of the mayor`s courts in Madras and Calcutta in 1726.

However, it was not until 1846 that the Lawyer Act opened the doors of the profession to all those who were duly qualified, certified and of good character, without distinction as to nationality or religion. Women were still excluded from the profession at that time, only to be admitted by the Women Legal Practitioners Act iii of 1923. The legal profession in India, which includes both the practice of law and professional legal education, is governed by the Lawyers Act 1961. The Bar Council of India (BCI) is provided for by the Lawyers Act as the body responsible for regulating the minimum standards to be adhered to by institutions providing legal education in India. The reform of legal education in India, carried out since the late 1980s at the initiative of the BCI, the University Grants Commission (UGC), the Law Commission of India and various state governments, has led to the establishment of various national law schools in India over the past two decades. India has the second largest avocado population in the world, after the United States. Many people have admitted that legal practice in India has gradually grown from around 70,000 at the time of independence in 1947 to around 1.25 million in 2014. India has a recorded legitimate history that begins since Vedic times, and some sort of common law framework may have been established in the mid-Bronze Age and Indus Valley civilization. Be that as it may, the further development of the “law” as a vocation is only a late miracle. India`s legitimate vocation is one of the most important on the planet and plays a fundamental role in the largest voting-based system on the planet. While the foundations of this vocation lie before independence, the vocation has evolved enormously from that moment on and now faces other difficulties; The most urgent thing is to grant access through vocation, to guarantee moral institutions and to modernize the practice, no matter how you look at it. [iv] “For the maintenance of the rule of law, it is essential that there be an organized legal profession that is free to regulate its own affairs.” Rule of law in a free society.

A Report on the International Congress of Jurists, New Delhi, India, 1959, p. 311. [ii] www.barcouncilofindia.org, accessed 03.05.2012. According to Section 11 of the Charter, the Supreme Court of Calcutta could admit lawyers and lawyers who “could appear, plead and act for the plaintiffs of the Court.” But the Supreme Court provided that lawyers and lawyers could exercise the ordinary powers of their respective professions – lawyers who had the power to appear and plead, and lawyers to appear and act for plaintiffs.